The SDP had a large presence in Northheim, an extremely class-conscious town. The party kept it's traditional organization and represented those who were seen as the lower classes, as it had always done since the beginning of the Weimar Republic. Yet when the depression hit, "the workers remained steadfastly in favor of the status quo while the middle class, only marginally hurt by the economic constriction, turned to revolution" (24).
Allen offers an explanation for why the middle class was drawn to the Nazi party: Many former military and nationalist groups, or antisemites, joined because of the far-right rhetoric of the party. Students joined because "its vague ideology of a new society in which patriotic solidarity would supplant Germany's rigid class distinctions" (25). But why didn't the underclasses turn to Nazism to the same degree? Surely the idea of a classless society unified by national identity held some appeal to them more than those with the comforts of the class structure?
The Nazi's local branches were highly versatile, able to manipulate their vague ideology to appeal to almost all classes of society, from businessmen to peasants. But I would venture to guess that what kept the poor away from the Nazis, at least initially, was the entrenched nature of the SPD. Allen says early in the book that the SPD organization held together the lower classes of Northeim, and forged a very important part of the community right up until the depression. It was tightly knit and active in the community, offering, as I see it, the only real competitor to the local Nazi branch. There had even been violent clashes between the parties.
But luckily for the Nazis, those who were not committed to the SDP and democracy were abundant, and their local system of of self-financing and speaker who could, with constant feedback, tailor their speeches to their audience. The middle and upper classes were also more likely to be educated and older, being both aware of national political sentiment and Germany's proud imperial past, and these factors coupled with the perceived failure of Democracy leading up to the depression, with the unemployment benefits issue and constant turnover of government, to the poor economic policies during the depression itself, likely radicalized what was left of the middle and upper classes as the depression spread to them too.
In lecture Prof. Ertman briefly mentioned that for the most part the NSDAP were not able to get votes from workers in the heavily worker inhabited area. As Peter above mentions this is also true of Northeim. The Nazi votes came largely from the middle class and the splinter parties. However, I wonder why more votes did not come from the workers in the SPD in Northeim.
ReplyDeleteAllen mentions “As the depression deepened…Many blamed the Social Democrats for not being radical enough (in economic matters) while still resenting their social composition and ‘leveling’ goals. Thus the SPD could not keep the middle classes from flocking to the banners of the NSDAP” (p. 55). I ask why this did not get the lower class worker to shift parties. I guess from the reading some went over to the communists. However, Hitler and his aggressive party show at each rally what they certainly do not lack is racidalism. Hitler did his Beer Hall Putsch in order to project this exact trait. He tried to demonstrate that the Nazi party will act and not sit back.
So when the depression hit and worsened, why hadn’t the workers finally broken ties with the SPD. The SPD had plenty of chances to make positive change. When they finally gained power, Ebert made surprising decisions to not fulfill most of their ideologies. The years after the SPD gained power, they also failed to solve unemployment. Instead under the SPD supported government unemployment rose. So I ask why hadn’t the workers shifted to the Nazi party who demonstrated that they would at least act, though they may not have shown that they would do so wisely.
The seemingly failure of capitalism during the Great Depression made the people of Germany start to doubt if Democracy was right for their country. This lead to the split during this time to the far left of the SPD and the far right of the NSDP. The ways of Socialism appealed to the workers and lower class population more than the right but yet the constant failure of the SPD to fulfill their ideas made it understandable why the majority of the country didn't fall back to the SPD and started to give the NSDAP a chance in office. The middle-upper class, who wanted nothing to do with the SPD and their ideas of socialism, saw the conservative and nationalistic qualities of the NSDAP and decided to listen to what they had to say. The charisma and unity throughout their party provided a nice change from the other parties who constantly split up and fought on the very issues that their parties apparently stood for. Thus the increasing popularity of the Nazi party in such a short time made sense because once a country is heading towards ruin, they look for answers from new government organizations and not the old. This is the basis of revolution, which the rise to power of the Nazi party can be seen as.
ReplyDelete